Styling social identity in Alexandrian funerary painting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26247/aura8.12Abstract
This paper explores the dynamics of social identity through the lens of funerary art in Hellenistic Alexandria, focusing on its fluid cultural, ethnic, and social constructs. Drawing upon a rich corpus of material, including painted funerary stelai, it examines how Alexandrian tombs served as spaces for narrating personal and communal identities in a cosmopolitan society. The analysis situates these representations within the broader artistic tradition of skiagraphia, demonstrating how tonal shading and physiognomic features convey not only lifelike portraits but also the ethos and social roles of the deceased. By contextualising these visual narratives against administrative practices, legal statuses, and the city’s multi-ethnic milieu, the paper argues that Alexandrian funerary art transcends mere mortuary function, reflecting ideological processes tied to identity, privilege, and memory. Through comparative perspectives drawn from Greek and Egyptian traditions, this research further reveals how artistry in funerary monuments articulated racial, cultural, and social hierarchies, embodying tensions between assimilation and differentiation. The study ultimately illustrates how Hellenistic Alexandria’s funerary art offers critical insights into pre-modern identity politics and the interplay between art, culture, and society in the ancient world.
References
Brekoulaki, H. 2012. “Ἀνδρείκελον: το χρώμα του δέρματος στην αρχαία ελληνική ζωγραφική”. In Δινήεσσα. Τιμητικός τόμος για την Κατερίνα Ρωμιοπούλου, edited by P. Adam-Veleni and K. Tzanavari, 339-350. Thessaloniki: Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki.
Cole, S.E. 2019. “Ptolemaic cavalrymen on painted Alexandrian funerary monuments”. Arts 8(2): 58-81.
De Lauretis, T. 1984. Alice Doesn’t. Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. London: Macmillan.
Doxiadis, E. 1995. The Mysterious Fayum Portraits. Faces from Ancient Egypt. London: Thames and Hudson.
Fischer-Bovet, C. 2018. “Official identity and ethnicity: Comparing Ptolemaic and Early Roman Egypt”. Journal of Egyptian History 11: 208-242.
Graeve, von V. and Preusser, F. 1981. “Zur Technik der griechischen Malerei auf Marmor”. In Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 96: 120-156.
Hall, S. 1990. “Cultural identity and diaspora.” In Identity. Community, Culture, Difference, edited by J. Rutherford, 222-237. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Helly, B. 1992. “Stèles funéraires de Démétrias : recherches sur la chronologie des remparts et des nécropoles méridionales de la ville”. In Πρακτικά Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου για την Αρχαία Θεσσαλία στη μνήμη Δ.Ρ. Θεοχάρη, 349-365. Athens: Archaeological Receipts Fund.
Lewis, N. 1986. Greeks in Ptolemaic Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCoskey D.E. 2002. “Race before “whiteness”: Studying identity in Ptolemaic Egypt”. Critical Sociology 28(1-2): 13-39.
Mirza, M.N. and Dungworth, D.B. 1995. “The potential misuse of genetic analyses and the social construction of ‘race’ and ‘ethnicity’”. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 14(3): 345–354.
Omi, M. and Winant, H. 19942. Racial Formation in the United States from the 1960s to the 1990s. New York and London: Routledge.
Plantzos, D. 2018. The Art of Painting in Ancient Greece. Athens and Atlanta, GA: Kapon Editions and Lockwood Press.
Plantzos, D. 2023. “The archaeology of exclusion: Repatriation, whiteness, and a lost daughter named Carrie”. Athens University Review of Archaeology 6: 99-116.
Plantzos, D. 2024. “‘Bones never lie’: forensic archaeology as a vehicle for archaeomentality”. CAS Sofia Working Paper Series 14: 76-103.
Riggs, C. 2002. “Facing the dead: Recent research on the funerary art of Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt”. American Journal of Archaeology 106(1): 85-101.
Stamatopoulou, M. 2016. “The banquet motif on the funerary stelai from Demetrias”. In Dining and Death. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the ‘Funerary Banquet’ in Ancient Art, Burial and Belief, edited by C.M. Draycott and M. Stamatopoulou, 405-480. Leuven: Peeters.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Author Rights:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work and grant AURA the right of first publication.
- The work will be published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. This license allows others to share the work with proper acknowledgment of the authorship and the journal's initial publication, provided the work is neither altered nor used for commercial purposes.
Reuse and Distribution:
- Authors may share and distribute the published version of their work, including depositing it in institutional repositories, publishing it in books, or posting it on personal or institutional websites, as long as proper acknowledgment of its initial publication in AURA is provided.
Author Responsibilities:
- Authors are responsible for obtaining all necessary copyright permissions for third-party materials included in their submissions (e.g., images, figures, tables).
- Authors must ensure that these permissions explicitly cover the reproduction and open-access distribution of such materials under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
- Documentation of copyright permissions must be provided upon request, and any issues related to copyright infringement will be the sole responsibility of the authors.
Indexing and Accessibility
- Authors grant AURA the right to submit their published work to relevant academic indexing services, repositories, and databases to ensure maximum visibility and accessibility.
- The inclusion of works in indexing platforms will follow the guidelines and requirements of the respective services, such as Scopus, Web of Science, and others.
By agreeing to publish with AURA, authors acknowledge and accept the above terms, ensuring their work adheres to the standards and policies of open-access publishing.
